The Myth Machine: How Conspiracy Theories Evolved from Storytelling

 

"When the gods fell silent, we invented algorithms. When the prophets disappeared, we logged on."

Once Upon a Time, We Needed Meaning

Once, humans gathered around fires to whisper about gods and monsters. The thunder wasn’t just noise; it was the fury of a sky god. Illness wasn’t random; it was punishment or possession. Storytelling wasn’t just entertainment. It was survival. It was how we made sense of storms, death, birth, betrayal. It wrapped mystery in metaphor and gave chaos a name.

Story is the oldest technology we have. Long before the written word, stories helped us pass knowledge, encode values, and connect through shared belief. They made time feel less cruel and fear less lonely. Myths gave shape to the unknown. Legends gave us heroes to root for, villains to blame, and destinies to fulfill.

The machinery of myth has always served the same core function: to turn confusion into clarity. Whether carved in stone, chanted in caves, or passed from mouth to mouth across centuries, the pattern holds. A good story doesn't just explain the world. It orders it.

Now fast-forward to the 21st century.

The gods have been replaced by CEOs, satellites, surveillance, and social networks. But the stories haven’t stopped. They’ve just evolved. Today’s myths are viral. Crowdsourced. Ever-shifting. They're no longer etched into tablets but woven through threads and comment chains. And they don’t come with warnings. They arrive as revelations.

They’re called conspiracy theories.

But what if we’ve misunderstood what they are?

What if conspiracy theories aren’t a glitch in our collective reasoning, but an inevitable upgrade in our ancient storytelling code? What if, in a world too complex to fully comprehend, the myth machine never stopped—it just logged on?

The Narrative Instinct Never Died

To call conspiracy theories “false” is technically correct, but that misses the point. The human brain doesn’t crave truth first. It craves coherence. Story is our default operating system, and we’ll choose a compelling fiction over an unsatisfying fact almost every time. Especially when the world feels unstable.

Conspiracies step in where traditional stories used to live: at the ragged edges of understanding. Just like ancient myths explained droughts or eclipses, modern conspiracies explain market crashes, pandemics, or why your vote didn’t seem to count. The difference? The old myths were built to endure. Conspiracies are built to evolve.

And like all good stories, they have recognizable beats.

There’s always a villain: the elite, the media, the government, the “they.” There’s always a secret: the truth hidden in plain sight. There’s often a hero: the lone researcher, the whistleblower, you. The quest is never-ending, and every attempt to disprove the theory only deepens the plot. It’s airtight. Suspicion becomes scripture.

This is narrative architecture, not accident.

Even the most bizarre conspiracies—lizard people, moon landings faked in a studio, microchips in vaccines—follow classic storytelling tropes. They borrow from science fiction, horror, religious prophecy. They blur genres like a river dissolving into the sea, carrying fragments of sci-fi, myth, and paranoia into a swelling tide of belief. What emerges isn’t a single truth, but a shared reality, often stronger than facts. Once someone accepts the premise, the plot takes over.

And unlike myths etched in stone, today’s conspiracies update in real time.

They respond to headlines, to tweets, to new technologies. They adjust. They swallow evidence and spit it back out in new forms. This isn’t just belief. It’s a participatory fiction that thrives on instability. And in an age of algorithmic newsfeeds and fragmented identity, that instability is constant.

So the question isn’t why conspiracy theories exist. It’s why they’re so seductive.

And the answer is simple: they feel like stories. Because they are.

Built to Go Viral

If ancient myths spread by campfire, conspiracy theories spread by comment section. Their delivery system has changed, but their fuel remains the same: fear, wonder, suspicion, and a need to belong.

Conspiracies aren't static ideas. They’re living stories, designed for transmission. They thrive in the spaces where traditional narratives break down, offering certainty when institutions go quiet or contradict themselves. In a world of 24/7 information overload, the conspiracy cuts through the noise because it’s emotionally charged, visually rich, and instantly engaging.

They’re engineered for virality, whether consciously or not.

You don’t need a printing press or a pulpit. Just a phone, a feeling, and a few followers. From there, the story spreads. Each retelling personalizes it. Each reply deepens the web. Social media isn’t just the medium. It’s the co-author. Everyone becomes a mythmaker.

And here’s the wild part: the more a conspiracy is debunked, the more believable it can become.

Why? Because once you're inside the story, opposition is part of the script. Debunkers become agents of the enemy. Fact-checkers are evidence of the cover-up. The plot expands to include its critics. It’s a self-reinforcing narrative loop, a feedback machine that protects itself through the illusion of persecution.

In this way, conspiracy theories act less like information and more like memes. They mutate. They multiply. They adapt to platforms, hashtags, and formats, from chain emails to TikToks. They’re agile, emotional, and built to outpace fact.

Compare that to institutional storytelling—journalism, academia, science. These systems move slowly. They hedge, qualify, revise. Conspiracies don’t. They’re immediate. They promise access. They say, “You know the truth. You are the resistance.”

That’s catnip for anyone who feels powerless, overlooked, or betrayed.

In short, conspiracy theories go viral because they’re designed like stories and delivered like secrets. And that’s a combination humanity has never been good at resisting.

The Folk Function of Conspiracies

To dismiss all conspiracy theories as delusion is to miss their deeper purpose. Because beyond the paranoia and pseudoscience, there’s something else humming beneath the surface—something human.

Conspiracies don’t just reflect what people believe. They reveal what people fear. They act as pressure valves for collective anxiety, especially when traditional sources of meaning—religion, government, science—feel compromised or inaccessible. In this sense, they serve a folk function: they’re people’s mythology, shaped from the ground up, not handed down from above.

These stories don’t require permission to be told. They don’t ask to be published. They rise organically from distrust, from grief, from the ache of powerlessness. They let the storyteller push back against the official record, to say: “No. That’s not how it happened. I see what really happened.”

It’s a kind of authorship, and sometimes, a kind of resistance.

For marginalized communities historically ignored or manipulated by dominant systems, skepticism isn’t irrational. It’s learned. And in those contexts, conspiracy theories can function as alternative histories or survival tactics. They’re ways of asserting agency in a world that often writes over or erases certain truths.

But this same narrative engine can run off the rails.

Conspiracies, like myths, can unify or divide, empower or harm. They can uncover hidden injustices or manufacture imaginary enemies. They can channel real anger into action or spiral it into violence. The line between cultural critique and dangerous fantasy is razor-thin, and often invisible from the inside.

Still, the myth machine keeps turning.

Because in the end, conspiracy theories aren’t about facts. They’re about feeling like you know something others don’t. They’re about reclaiming the role of the storyteller, especially in a world where most people feel like they’ve been reduced to the audience.

They’re a folk remedy for disconnection. And like any folk tale, their survival depends on retelling, reshaping, and refusing to let the narrative die.

The Myth Machine Never Stopped. It Upgraded.

We like to think of conspiracy theories as glitches, bugs in the software of modern society. But maybe they’re not bugs at all. Maybe they’re features. Maybe they’re proof that the myth-making instinct never left us. It just changed format.

In a world too vast, fast, and fragmented to fully comprehend, conspiracy theories offer a seductive clarity. They take the noise and sculpt it into a story. They return meaning to the meaningless. They whisper, nothing is random. Someone is behind this. And that’s comforting, even when it’s terrifying.

This doesn’t mean conspiracies are harmless. Far from it. The wrong story, believed deeply enough, can justify cruelty, destroy trust, and collapse reality into factions. But to fight them, we first have to understand them—not just as falsehoods, but as narratives. As evolving myths, built from fear and stitched together with belief.

We’re all part of the myth machine now.
We tweet, repost, record, remix.
We search for sense in the senseless.

And maybe the real danger isn’t that people believe wild stories.
It’s that they’re desperate for stories at all, and no one else is telling them.

 

Support Independent Content Creation

I know, I know, I know...

These donation messages can be intrusive. I understand that. (Trust me, I feel awkward writing them too!)

But reaching out like this is crucial. Being reader-funded gives my work something valuable that many content creators don't have: true independence.

1. Your support means I can write about what matters. I'm not chasing sponsorships or compromising my voice to please advertisers. I can pursue stories and topics I believe are important, creative, and thoughtful, regardless of their commercial appeal.

2. Your support means I don't have to chase viral trends. Instead of engineering clickbait or jumping on every passing bandwagon, I can focus on creating thoughtful content that genuinely adds value to your life.

3. Your support means this content remains freely accessible. My work stays available to everyone, including those who can't afford to contribute financially right now. Quality independent content should be accessible to all.

I understand not everyone is in a position to contribute, but if you found any value in this post you can

For the price of a coffee, you'll enable me to invest more time in creating in-depth, creative journal posts and episodes of the Stone & Signal podcast. If you'd like to contribute more, consider purchasing one of my e-books (priced at roughly two cups of coffee) – a way to support my work while gaining additional value for yourself.

Thank you for considering. Your support makes all the difference.