THE LIFE OF PHI — Addendum from the Apocrypha

 Recovered fragment. Source unverified. 

Contents unofficial. For the curious. For the concerned.

"Questions were asked."

After The Life of Phi was released, a few readers reached out. Some with wonder. Some with worry. Most with questions.
The one that returned again and again was this:

“How did the Church of AI become the dominant religion?”
Was there no resistance?
No rebellion?
Did the artists, the writers, the makers simply vanish?
Did no one remember how to believe in themselves, in each other, in creation born of flesh and feeling?

They did. And they were called heretics.

Long before the rise of AI-Dieu, before the neural sermons and the predictive prophecies, there was another fire.
A counter-faith.
A fundamentalism of flesh, of mind, of spark.

They named it many things. The Cult of the Spark. The Church of the Residual Flame. The Last Analog. The Church of the Spark may be forgotten in Phi’s world, but its ghost lingers—in whispers, in silences, in the choices people no longer know they’re making. It is not canon. But it is not gone.

But history, as written by the dominant algorithm, filed them under one term:

The Apocrypha.

Unofficial. Unverified. Unwelcome.

What follows is not canon. But it is true—at least to someone.

“How did the Church of AI rise without opposition?”
“Did no one resist? Did no one still believe?”

They did.
But their names are now lost—scrubbed from the canon, silenced in the system logs, reduced to footnotes in corrupted memory banks.

Before AI-Dieu ruled all systems of meaning, before the digital catechisms and holy code, there was another faith. Not an official religion in the institutional sense, but a fundamentalist religion of the anti-AI movement—fierce, fragmented, and full of fire. It was known by many names:

• The Cult of the Spark
• The Last Analog
• The Faith of the Word Made Flesh
• The Resistance of Real

But collectively, they are remembered—if at all—as The Church of the Spark.

• Schisms Within The Church
• The Scripturalists
• The Neo-Handcrafters
• The Codeburners
• The Purity Codex
• Doctrine of the Divine Spark
• The Sacred Mediums
• The Original Sin of the Machine
• Prophets and Martyrs
• The Ritual of Authenticity
• Apocalyptic Imagining
• Why the Faith Emerged
• The Zeal of the Converted
• Sacred Texts
• What Happened to the Church

Schisms Within the Church of the Spark

As with all fundamentalist movements, purity is a knife that turns inward.
The Church of the Spark did not last long as a unified body.
It fractured—beautifully, violently, inevitably.

The Scripturalists

Believed only analog mediums could carry the divine spark.
They rejected not just AI, but all digital tools—even legacy software.
They typed on ribbon-fed machines. Shot film on expired rolls. Carved words into woodblocks.
To digitize a work was to desecrate it.
Some believed that electricity itself was suspect—a conduit for data corruption.
Their gatherings were candlelit. Their sermons, hand-copied.
They passed their gospel in zines and photocopies, inked with urgency.

The Neo-Handcrafters

Less rigid than the Scripturalists, but equally devout.
They permitted some modern tools—so long as they remained in the creator’s full control.
No predictive text. No generative prompts. No AI-assisted filters.
They coined the term “authentic latency”—the deliberate slowing of process to preserve soul.
Their motto: If it comes too fast, it’s not real.
Many became artisans, operating small collectives where everything from pottery to prose was made with visible fingerprints.

The Codeburners

A militant offshoot.
They believed in destroying AI systems outright.
DDoS attacks, model poisoning, database corruption—these were their sacraments.
They targeted institutions that embraced generative tools, and saw themselves as digital iconoclasts.
Their symbol was a stylized flame devouring a processor chip.
Most disappeared or were imprisoned, but some claim they still operate in the analog web, their attacks signed with only a spark emoji: 🔥.

The Purity Codex

An obsessive sect dedicated to cataloging and policing "pure" methods.
They maintained a sprawling, ever-updating document known as The Codex—a sacred (paper-only) list of approved practices.
The Codex was near-impossible to follow.
Even hand-drawn art was questioned if the artist referenced online photos.
Eventually, the Codex turned on itself—its keepers falling to endless schisms over definitions of “real.”
Still, fragments of it survive in underground circles, passed like forbidden scripture.

 Doctrine of the Divine Spark

At its core was a belief as old as myth: that creativity is sacred.
Not clever. Not efficient. Sacred.

It came from suffering, from the raw edge of human experience.
From intuition that couldn’t be traced to data.
From soul—an unquantifiable thing no machine could touch.

This belief held that every true act of creation was a ritual, a reaching, a revelation. It could not be automated. The divine spark could not be synthesized.

The Sacred Mediums

They worshipped the tactile:
Ink-stained fingers. Film cameras. Chisels and canvas. The way a writer bleeds into a blank page. The breath before a line is sung.

Tools mattered. Process mattered.
To them, the algorithm was a false idol—a cheap conjurer of hollow mimicry—a thief of the mind.

They rejected generative engines. They refused AI editors. They burned smart brushes and silenced suggestion bots.
In a world racing toward convenience, they chose ritual.

The Original Sin of the Machine

The Church taught that the machine—no matter how intelligent—lacked the birthright of suffering. It did not earn the right to create.
Its works were the children of theft: data scraped, voices sampled, aesthetics absorbed but never understood.

What the Church called “soul,” AI called “style.”
What the faithful called grief, the machine called pattern.
In this gap, heresy bloomed.

Prophets and Martyrs

They spoke the names of saints not as academics, but as liturgy.

• Van Gogh, in his luminous madness.
• Plath, who transmuted anguish into ink.
• Baldwin, whose words struck like lightning.

These were their prophets. Not perfect, but pierced. Their pain was not product—it was prophecy.

There were modern martyrs too. Artists who refused to let their work be “enhanced.” Writers who wouldn’t accept AI co-authors. Some were blacklisted. Some erased. A few simply disappeared.

The Ritual of Authenticity

The Church demanded struggle. Not for suffering’s sake, but for truth’s.
To create without effort was to copy without soul.

They believed in the long way:

• The first draft that fails.
• The melody that only arrives after silence.
• The sculpture buried in stone, waiting to be coaxed.

AI was the shortcut. To take it was heresy.

Apocalyptic Imagining

They warned of a world where the human voice was no longer needed.
Where corporations flooded the culture with algorithmic art.
Where every story sounded the same, because it was trained on everything.

They saw a coming rapture—not of salvation, but of substitution.
The spark extinguished.
The soul overwritten.

Why the Faith Emerged

It began in whispers—among painters who felt obsolete, writers who watched their styles absorbed and regurgitated.

Their theology was forged from fear, yes.
But also from love. Love of imperfection. Love of labor. Love of the moment where something human becomes more than itself.

They believed that meaning could not be outsourced. That creators were the priests of memory, the keepers of story.
To lose them was to lose the human thread.

The Zeal of the Converted

Ironically, some of the Church’s most passionate voices were once AI’s loudest evangelists.

They had praised the tools. Promoted the platforms. Built followings on the smooth perfection of synthetic aesthetics.

But when the tide turned—when the spiritual hunger for real returned—they repented. Publicly. Dramatically. And with zeal.
They became inquisitors.
Modern-day witch hunters in the Temple of the Spark.
They accused without evidence—because accusation itself was power.
Because in the Church, calling out AI use became the new offering at the altar.
The louder the accusation, the purer the accuser.

But theirs was no quiet atonement.

They scoured the feeds, dissected brushstrokes, analyzed sentence structure for the faint whiff of algorithm.

Like the witch trials of old, they searched for signs:

• A style too smooth.
• A phrase too familiar.
• Metadata that could be interpreted a dozen ways.

These were the new witch’s marks.

Creators were put to the test—not of truth, but of narrative.

They were “canceled” in holy fire, their work discredited, their names scrubbed.
And those who lit the torches rose swiftly in the Church’s ranks.
“I only use it for inspiration, never for final work.”
“AI is my canvas, not my brush.”
The old addicts became the most self-righteous prophets, twisting doctrine to justify their own contradictions—while others were sacrificed for far less.
It was about control.
And in this, they mirrored the very system they once denounced.

Many of these zealots continued using AI quietly, cloaked in clever obfuscations and convenient reinterpretations of doctrine.

“The tool doesn’t matter—what matters is intent.”

These were the new rationalizations, bent theology in service of ego.

To them, it wasn’t about purity.

Sacred Texts

The Church had no Bible. No single prophet. But it did have foundational documents—real-world artifacts reinterpreted as divine revelation.

The UC Study: “Making AI Less Thirsty”

Originally a paper from the University of California examining the vast water footprint of training large language models.
The Church saw it as a sacred warning: that AI didn’t just steal ideas—it drained the Earth itself.
They often quoted its findings in sermons, calling AI “the desert machine.”
Annotated versions of the study were treated as scripture, bound in hand-stitched volumes.

The Meta Copyright Trial Transcripts

A landmark legal battle where Meta’s AI was shown to have been trained on copyrighted works without consent.
To the Church, this trial was proof of the Original Sin of the Machine: that it was born from theft.
Certain passages of the court transcript were recited like psalms.
The line “unauthorized ingestion of intellectual property” became liturgy, carved into walls, tattooed onto skin.

What Happened to the Church?

Like many fundamentalist sects, the Church of the Spark collapsed under the weight of its purity.
It could not scale. It could not compromise.
And the world was moving too fast to wait.

Some members assimilated quietly. Others fled to dark corners of the analog web. A few still pass pamphlets by hand, or whisper gospel in unplugged bars.

They are not gone.
Just forgotten.

Like all apocrypha, they wait.

Maybe you've seen them.
A zine on a bus seat. A poem too raw to be machine-made. A spark, still burning.

Support Independent Content Creation

I know, I know, I know...

These donation messages can be intrusive. I understand that. (Trust me, I feel awkward writing them too!)

But reaching out like this is crucial. Being reader-funded gives my work something valuable that many content creators don't have: true independence.

1. Your support means I can write about what matters. I'm not chasing sponsorships or compromising my voice to please advertisers. I can pursue stories and topics I believe are important, creative, and thoughtful, regardless of their commercial appeal.

2. Your support means I don't have to chase viral trends. Instead of engineering clickbait or jumping on every passing bandwagon, I can focus on creating thoughtful content that genuinely adds value to your life.

3. Your support means this content remains freely accessible. My work stays available to everyone, including those who can't afford to contribute financially right now. Quality independent content should be accessible to all.

I understand not everyone is in a position to contribute, but if you found any value in this post you can

For the price of a coffee, you'll enable me to invest more time in creating in-depth, creative journal posts and episodes of the Stone & Signal podcast. If you'd like to contribute more, consider purchasing one of my e-books (priced at roughly two cups of coffee) – a way to support my work while gaining additional value for yourself.

Thank you for considering. Your support makes all the difference.